Thursday : May 1, 2025
05 : 59 : 10 AM
Breaking News

Elon Musk's replacement as CEO is being sought by the Tesla board: Report

Waqf Amendment Bill Live: Parliamentary Conflict Between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav

top-news



The debate over the **Waqf Amendment Bill** in Parliament turned into a heated political showdown as **Samajwadi Party (SP) chief Akhilesh Yadav** and **Union Home Minister Amit Shah** exchanged sharp remarks. The discussion, which was meant to focus on reforms in Waqf properties management, quickly escalated into a war of words, with both leaders accusing each other of political opportunism and misrepresentation of facts.  

*Akhilesh Yadav’s Opposition to the Bill**  
Akhilesh Yadav, a vocal critic of the BJP-led government, raised objections to the proposed amendments, arguing that they could lead to unnecessary government interference in Waqf properties, which are traditionally managed by Muslim religious bodies. He accused the BJP of trying to control these assets for political gains.  

*“The Waqf Board has functioned independently for decades. Why does the government suddenly want to change its structure? Is this another attempt to interfere in minority affairs?”* Yadav questioned. He also alleged that the bill was being pushed without proper consultation with stakeholders, particularly Muslim organizations.  

Yadav further linked the amendment to the broader political agenda of the BJP, suggesting that it was part of a larger pattern of undermining minority institutions. *“First, they target madrasas, then Haj subsidies, and now Waqf properties. What next?”* he asked, drawing strong reactions from the treasury benches.  

Amit Shah’s Strong Rebuttal
 
Amit Shah, known for his assertive parliamentary style, dismissed Yadav’s allegations as **“misleading and politically motivated.”** He defended the bill, stating that the amendments were aimed at **bringing transparency and preventing corruption** in the management of Waqf properties, which span thousands of acres across India.  

*“The Waqf Board controls prime land worth lakhs of crores, but there have been numerous cases of illegal occupation and misuse. This bill will ensure accountability and stop the loot,”* Shah asserted. He accused opposition parties of **“defending corruption”** under the guise of minority rights.  

Shah also took a personal dig at Akhilesh Yadav, reminding him of **his own party’s controversies** related to land disputes in Uttar Pradesh. *“Those who have been involved in illegal land grabs in UP are now preaching to us about protecting Waqf properties,”* he said, triggering protests from SP members.  

The Political Undertones

The clash over the Waqf Amendment Bill is not just about administrative reforms but also reflects the ongoing **political polarization** ahead of crucial elections. The BJP has been pushing for greater regulation of Waqf properties, arguing that they should be utilized for public welfare rather than being mismanaged. However, opposition parties see this as an attempt to **dilute Muslim autonomy** and consolidate Hindu votes.  

Akhilesh Yadav’s aggressive stance is also aimed at **reaffirming his support for Muslim voters**, a key constituency for the SP in Uttar Pradesh. Meanwhile, Amit Shah’s counterattack reinforces the BJP’s narrative of **fighting corruption and ensuring equitable development** for all communities.  

Conclusion
The parliamentary debate on the Waqf Amendment Bill once again highlighted the deep ideological divide between the BJP and opposition parties. While the government insists that the reforms will bring efficiency and curb corruption, critics view them as a means of increasing state control over minority institutions. With both sides unwilling to back down, the issue is likely to remain a contentious topic in India’s political discourse, especially as elections approach.  

As the debate continues outside Parliament, the question remains: **Is this about genuine reform or political one-upmanship?** The answer may depend on which side of the political spectrum one stands.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search

Category

Gallery

  • gallery
  • gallery
  • gallery
  • gallery
  • gallery
  • gallery

Tags

Social Media

Related Posts

top-news

Following a conversation with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, S. Jaishankar posted: "Planners and backers must be."

top-news

Palwasha Mohammad Zai Khan is who? According to a senator, the Pak army will lay the first brick at the rebuilt Babri.

top-news

Days after the Pahalgam terror assault, India blocks Pakistani aircraft from using its airspace.